Wednesday, 18 February 2015

Prevention of Sexual Harassment of Women at the Workplace – Amendments to CCS(Conduct) Rules 1964

G.I., Dep. of Per. & Trg., O.M.No. 11013/2/2014-Estt (A-III), dated 2.2.2015

Subject: Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules 1964 — Guidelines regarding prevention of sexual harassment of women at the workplace— regarding

Following the promulgation of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 [SHWW(PPR) Act] and notification of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Rules, 2013 [SHWW(PPR) Rules] on 09.12.2013., the Government has recently, on 19.11.2014, notified the amendments to Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules 1964 and Classification, Control and Appeal Rules, 1965. 


The amendments and other salient features of the Act/ Rules was brought to the notice of all concerned vide Office Memorandum of even no. dated 27.11.2014. The amendments to the Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules 1964 and Classification, Control and Appeal Rules, 1965 and the Office Memorandum dated 01.12.2014 are available on the Department’s website.

2. The following guidelines, conveying the decision of the Committee of Secretaries on this subject, were issued vide this Department’s Office Memorandum No. 11013/3/2009-Estt.(A) dated 03.08.2009, “As regards provisions for protection of women, it was suggested that the complaints committee mechanism provided under Vishakha guidelines relating to sexual harassment should be strictly in accordance with the judgment and steps should be taken to ensure that the committee is effective and functional at all times. It would also be desirable for the Committees to meet once a quarter, even if there is no live case, and review preparedness to fulfil all requirements of the Vishakha judgment in the Department/Ministry/ organization concerned.”

3. As per the guidelines issued vide Office Memorandum dated 21.07.2009, it is also to be ensured that the Complaints Committee shall at all times be in existence and changes in its composition, whenever necessary, should be made promptly and adequately publicized. The composition of the Complaints Committee should also be posted on the websites of the concerned Ministries/Departments/Offices concerned.

4. Vide the Office Memorandum dated 01.12.2014, the attention of the Ministries/Departments was also invited to the reporting requirements mentioned in the SHWW(PPR) Act and SHWW(PPR) Rules.

5. All Ministries/ Departments are requested to please review the progress of implementation of the existing abovementioned guidelines issued in the aftermath of the Vishakha judgment.

6. Attention of all Ministries is invited to Section 22 of the Act relating to including information in Annual Report, and to request that information relating to number of cases filed, if any, and their disposal may be included in the Annual Report of the Ministry / Department.

7. All Ministries / Departments are also requested to furnish an annual return (as on 31st March) in the enclosed proforma to this Department by 30th April every year.

Authority: www.persmin.gov.in(DoPT)

AIR TRAVEL ONLTC 2010-13 RELAXATION REGARDING

Immedaite 

F. No. AV.18011/05/2012-AI 
Government of India/ Ministry of Civil Aviation ## 
Rajiv Gandhi Bhawan, Safdarjung Airport New Delhi-no 003, 
dated : 19.12.2014 

OFFICE MEMORANDUM 
Subject: Air Travel on LTC for the Block year 2010-13 — relaxation of Government instructions                     regarding.

Ministry of Finance (MoF) vide O.M. No. 19024/1/2009-E.IV dated 13.7.2009 inter alia envisage that in all cases of air travel, both domestic and international, where the Government of India bears the cost of air passage, the officials concerned may travel only by Air India. For travel to stations not connected by Air India, the officials may travel by Air India to the hub/ point closest to their eventual destination, beyond which they may utilize the services of another airline etc. Department of Personnel & Training (DoPT) vide O.M. No.31o11/2/2006-Estt.(A) dated 27th July, 2009 had extended the applicability of the MoF's instructions for LTC purposes. MoF directed that in all cases of deviation of above instructions etc. individual cases be referred to the Ministry of Civil Aviation (MoCA) for relaxation. 

2. This Ministry has been receiving a number of requests for consideration of blanket/ general permission for LTC on routes where Air India does not provide service and also Air India tickets are not available. The matter has been examined in this Ministry and it has been decided with the approval of Competent Authority to grant permission to Government officials to travel by an airline other than Air India w.e.f. 10.12.2014, only for the purpose of the LTC Block year culminating on 31.12.2014 and only in cases of nonavailability of required number of seats on Air India for onward journey till 31.12.2014 and also subject to the condition that the fare charged by any private airline, which is over and above the LTC 80 fare for the sector, shall be borne by the concerned Government official and also subject to the condition that purchase of tickets is done in accordance with the instructions issued by Ministry of Finance from time to time. 

1. All Ministries/Departments of the Government of India for circulation to all attached/subordinate/autonomous bodies under their jurisdiction. 
2. Ministry of Finance, E.IV Division, North Block, New Delhi 
3. Department of Personnel & Training, North Block, New Delhi. 
4. Copy along with copies of enclosures sent to Director, NIC Cell, M/o Civil Aviation for uploading on the website of the Ministry. 
Pre-Budget Consultation with Finance Minister 

Central Trade Unions demanded directional change of economic policies 

We demand Govt to ensure ‘Ease of life and livelihood of the common people”, “not merely 

ease of doing business”—the central trade unions asserted in the prebudget consultation 

meeting with Finance Minister on 17th January 2015. 

All the eleven central trade unions submitted joint memorandum which basically underlined 

trade unions’ view and proposals for directional change in the pro-corporate pro-big-business 

economic policy regime which landed the country’s economy into a mess in the process of last 

few decades. They spoke on one voice on the disastrous consequences even during the 

period under the new government at the centre, of such pro-corporate economic policy regime 

on the declining standard of living of the common people and also on employment generation, 

downslide in wages, mass scale contractorisation etc. 

CITU was represented in the meeting by its General Secretary, Tapan Sen. Sen reminded the 

Finance Minister that in the same pre-budget consultation meeting held on 6TH June 2014, 

trade unions urged upon reversal of the economic policies followed by the UPA govt which 

according to Finance Minister himself, landed the country’s economy in the mess. He has 

many times made such comment both inside and outside Parliament. But in the process of 

last eight months it became clear that his government has been pursuing the same brand of 

policies more aggressively bulldozing the opinions of the common people, trade unions and 

various mass organization and also bulldozing the Parliament through Ordinance route. He 

reminded the Minister that the Govt felt it emergency in promulgating Ordinances for 

denationalization of the coal industry, for tampering the Land Acquisition Act for the benefit of 

big corporates and land-mafias, But no emergency was felt for implementing the consensus 

tripartite recommendations of successive Indian Labour Conferences for enhancing minimum 

wage to Rs 15000/- or giving the anganwadi, mid-day-meal, ASHA and other scheme workers 

the right of minimum wage and social security benefit or ensuring same wage as regular 

workers for the contract workers for doing the same work. And while neglecting these issues 

involving millions of working people, slogans are being chanted “sabka saath –sabka vikash” 

in the media particularly when in the span of last two years including eight months of NDA rule, 

wage level in rural india has taken a drastic and dramatic plunge. During the same period, 

MNREGA expenditures declined by 3 and 36 per cent as per Mid Year Economic Analysis 

published by Govt. The same document expressed expectation of same trend of deceleration 

of wage to continue. Side by side, the urban wage-level is being suppressed to the level of 

hardly 2.5% of the total cost of production on the average. This is quite natural since the Govt 

is busy in promoting “ease of doing business” complementary to which creating severe un-
ease and miseries in the lives and living of the working people. If these trend continues, the 

NDA Govt’s so called dream of all round development will remain a mere rhetoric being made 

by the Minister in public domain through media to deceive the people –that can never 

materialize in the face of aggravating poverty, decline in purchasing power of the common 

people and shrinkage of the domestic market making any investment unsustainable The Govt 

must the direction of its policies reversing its project of privatization, dismantling labour laws 

and frittering away natural resources. 


Among the trade union leaders present in the meeting were Brijesh Upadhyay and Surendran 

(BMS), D L Sachdeva (AITUC), S Q Jama(INTUC), R K Sharma (AIUTUC), Shanmugan (LPF) 

Monali (SEWA), Ashok Ghosh (UTUC), S P Tewari (TUCC), Santosh Roy (AICCTU), S D 

Tyagi(HMS). 

The joint memorandum submitted by the Central Trade Unions is reproduced below. 

CENTRAL TRADE UNIONS’ JOINT MEMORANDUM TO FINANCE MINISTER 

                                                                                                                         17th January 2015 

The Hon’ble Minister of Finance, 
Govt. of India, 
North Block, 

New Delhi 

Dear Sir, 

We thank you for inviting the central trade unions representing the working people in the country in both organized and unorganized sector for this pre-budget consultation. In the previous pre-budget consultation meeting with you held on 6th June 2014, we urged upon you to please consider a directional change in the economic policy regime from that pursued during the previous government which, you have also admitted, had landed the country’s economy in a bad situation. In fact, we had articulated our views and proposals on that premise. But we like to submit candidly that our proposals did not receive a positive response and the economic policies followed the same trajectory and made situation worse for the mass of the people during the intervening period. Sir, the Mid Term Economic Analysis (2014-15) by Govt of India itself admitted that for the period under review despite increase in GDP growth rate, and a much bigger increase in profit of the corporate sector and big business lobby, the wages for the working people who actually create the GDP in both rural and urban areas plunged on the average. Overall standard of living of people deteriorated and unemployment situation in the country has not improved in the least. Much more jobs were lost owing to closure/lockout, retrenchment than created during the intervening period. And in the midst of such situation, the Govt has already decided to cut already budgeted expenditure in the social sector such as MNREGA, Health, Education etc which we strongly deplore. Such a phenomenon warranted serious reconsideration on directional change in the economic policy regime and we again urge you for he same. 

2 We express our serious concern and dismay over the manner the Govt have been pushing various major economic policy related decisions through promulgation of Ordinances. At least eight Ordinances were promulgated during last eight months of the new Govt. We record our determined opposition to such practice of Ordinance route of governance. In particular we also oppose the Ordinance on coal sector, insurance sector and on Land Acquisition Act and want you to please take note of the rousing opposition and struggles by the workers and the farmers against such disastrous exercises. We demand all such Ordinances should be withdrawn forthwith.We wish that our candid observations, considered views and concrete proposals are taken in the right spirit and responded with all seriousness and given appropriate reflections in the ensuing budget 2014-15. 

Our proposals: Some of these specific proposals have time and again been placed by us in various policy smoaking fora including the earlier pre-budget consultations. However, we would like to reiterate them, urging your positive response: 

• Take effective measures to arrest the spiraling price rise and to contain inflation; Ban speculative forward trading in commodities; Universalise and strengthen the Public Distribution System; Ensure proper check on hoarding; Rationalise, with a view to reduce the burden on people, the tax/duty/cess on petroleum products. 

• There must be massive investment in the infrastructure in order to stimulate the economy for job creation. The Mid Term Economic Analysis(2014-15) published by Govt of India has clearly mentioned about the failure of the PPP experiments in infrastructure development and opined for public investment. It is our considered view that the Public sector should take the leading role in this regard. The plan & non-plan expenditure should be increased in the budget to stimulate jobs creation and guarantee consistent income to people. 

• Minimum wage linked to Consumer Price Index must be guaranteed to all workers, taking into consideration the recommendations of the 15th Indian Labour Conference as enriched by Apex Court of the country as reiterated in 44th ILC in 2012. In any case, it should not be less than Rs.15,000/- p.m. 

• FDI should not be allowed in crucial sectors like defence production, telecommunications, Railways, financial sector, retail trade, education, health and media. 

• The public sector units played a crucial role during the year of severe contraction of private capital investment immediately following the outbreak of global financial crisis. PSUs should be strengthened and expanded. Disinvestment of shares of profit making public sector units should be stopped forthwith. Budgetary support should be given for revival of potentially viable Sick CPSUs 

• In view of huge joblosses and mounting unemployment problem, the ban on recruitment in Govt. deptts, PSUs and autonomous institutions (including recent Finance Ministry’s instruction to abolish those posts not filled for one year) should be lifted as recommended by 43rd Session of Indian Labour Conference. Condition of surrender of 

3 posts in govt. departments and PSUs should be scrapped and new posts be created keeping in view the new work and increased workload. 

• Proper allocation of funds be made for interim relief of 20% and 100% DA merge with basic pay and allowances including neutralization percentage be paid on merged DA in view of 7th CPC to all Govt. employees. Similarly, 100% DA of PSU employees be also merged with basic pay. 

• The scope of MGNREGA be extended to agriculture operations and urban areas as well and employment for minimum period of 200 days with guaranteed statutory wage be provided, as unanimously recommended by 43rd Session of Indian Labour Conference. The drastic cut already inflicted on the MNREGA allocation should be restored. 

• The massive workforce engaged in ICDS, Mid-day meal scheme, Vidya volunteers, Guest Teachers, Siksha Mitra, the workers engaged in the Accredited Social HealthActivities (ASHA) and other schemes be regularized. No to privatization of centrally funded schemes. Universalisation of ICDS be done as per Supreme Court directions by making adequate budgetary allocations. 

• Steps be taken for removal of all restrictive provisions based on poverty line in respect of eligibility coverage of the schemes under the Unorganised Workers Social Security Act 2008 and allocation of adequate resources for the National Fund for Unorganised Workers to provide for Social Security to all unorganized workers including the contract/casual and migrant workers in line with the recommendations of Parliamentary Standing Committee on Labour and also the 43rd Session of Indian Labour Conference. 

• Remunerative Prices should be ensured for the agricultural produce and Govt.investment public investment in agriculture sector must be substantially augmented as a proportion of GDP and total budgetary expenditure. It should also be ensured that benefits of the increase reach the small, marginal and medium cultivators only; 

• Budgetary provision should be made for providing essential services including housing, public transport, sanitation, water, schools, crèche health care etc. to workers in the new emerging industrial areas. Working women’s hostels should be set up where thereis a concentration of women workers. 

• Requisite budgetary support for addressing crisis in traditional sectors like Jute, Textiles, Plantation, Handloom, Carpet and Coir etc. 

• Budgetary provision for elementary education should be increased, particularly in the context of the implementation of the ‘Right to Education’ as this is the most effective tool to combat child labour. 

• The system of computation of Consumer Price Index should be reviewed as the present index is causing heavy financial loss to the workers. 

• Income Tax exemption ceiling for the salaried persons should be raised to Rs.5 lakh per annum and fringe benefits like housing, medical and educational facilities and running allowances, Railways Running Staff and a staff in other deptts should be exempted from the income tax net in totality. 

• Threshold limit of 20 employees in EPF Scheme be brought down to 10 as recommended by CBT-EPF. Pension benefits under EPS unilaterally withdrawn by the Govt. should be restored. Govt. and Employers contribution be increased to allow sustainability of Employees Pension Scheme and for provision of minimum pension of Rs.3000/- p.m. 

4 • New Pension Scheme be withdrawn and newly recruited employees of central and state govts on or after 1.1.2004 be covered under Old Pension Scheme; 

• Demand for Dearness Allowance merger by Central Govt. and PSUs employees be accepted and adequate allocation of fund for this be made in the budget; 

• All interests and social security of the domestic workers to be statutorily protected on the lines of the ILO Convention on domestic workers. 

• The Cess Management of the construction workers is the responsibility of the Finance Ministry under the Act and the several irregularities found in collection of cess be rectified as well as their proper utilization must be ensured.In regard to resource mobilization, we would like to emphasize the following: 

• A progressive taxation system should be put in place to ensure taxing the rich and the affluent sections who have the capacity to pay at a higher degree. The corporate service sector, traders, wholesale business, private hospitals and institutions etc. should be brought under broader and higher tax net. Increase taxes on luxury goods and reduce indirect taxes on essential commodities as at present the overwhelming majority of the populations are subjected to Indirect taxes that constitute 86% of the revenue. 

• Concrete steps must be taken to recover huge accumulated unpaid tax arrears which has already crossed more than Rs.5 lakh crore on direct and corporate tax account alone, and has been increasing at a geometric proportion. Such huge tax-evasion over and above the liberal tax concessions already given in the last two budgets should not be allowed to continue. 

• The SIT constituted for unearthing black money must deliver visible result which is yet to be seen. Effective measures should be taken to unearth huge accumulation of black money in the economy including the huge unaccounted money in tax heavens abroad and within the country. Finance Minister should make provisions to bring back the illicit flows from India which are at present more than twice the current external debt of US $ 230 billion. This money should be directed towards providing social security. 

• Concrete measures be expedited for recovering the NPAs of the banking system which is on the increasing trend again from the willfully defaulting corporate and business houses. By making provision in Banking Regulations Act, CMDs and Executives to be made accountable for creation of NPAs. 

• Tax on Long term capital gains to be introduced; so also higher taxes on the security transactions to be levied. 

• The rate of wealth tax, corporate tax, gift tax etc. to be expanded and enhanced. 

• ITES, outsourcing sector, Educational Institutions and Health Services etc. run on 

commercial basis should be brought under Service Tax net. Govt. 

• Small saving instruments under postal and other agencies be encouraged by incentivizing commission agents of these scheme 

OUR SERIOUS CONCERN:

We would like to express our strong resentment that the previous Govt. failed to positively respond to the collective voice of the Central Trade Unions on the very important 

5 issues concerning the working people of India, both organized and unorganized, consistently repeated in the form of a ‘10 point charter’ backed by several collective nationwideprogrammes. We expect that this Govt. will take initiative to discuss these issues with the Central Trade Unions in order to find a solution. We also express our opposition to the so called Banking Reforms encouraging private sector/capitalists banking at the cost of public sector banks which saved the economy to an extent during the last global financial meltdown. We also oppose increase in limit of FDI and disinvestment of equity in insurance sector and FDI in pension. We strongly oppose the FDI in Defence and Retail Sector. Several such measures against the working men and women inthis country including anti workers proposals contained in the New Manufacturing Policy have our strong opposition, as in our experience these kinds of measures have helped the growth of only a small section of the capitalists while the larger sections of the working population continue to be marginalized and impoverished. We also oppose the hectic measures of changing labour laws in the name of labour reform both by the central and the state governments which are basically aimed 
at legitimizing ongoing widespread violations by the employers’ class and also throw out overwhelming majority of the workforce of the purview of the labour laws themselves at the total mercy of the employers. 

POST BUDGET MEETING WITH TRADE UNIONS 

Successive Finance Ministers have agreed to hold post budget meetings / consultations with the central trade unions. However, it has not been materialized except for one occasion. We understand such meetings did take place with the Corporate Associations/Employers Federations. We would like to importunate upon you to arrange such post budget meeting with trade unions also. 

With regards, 

Brijesh Upadhyay S Q Jama D L Sachdeva Harbhajan Singh Sidhu Tapan Sen 

BMS INTUC AITUC HMS CITU 

Yours sincerely, 

R K Sharma S P Tewari Monali Santosh Roy Ashok Ghosh Shanmugan 

AIUTUC TUCC SEWA AICCTU UTUC LPF

TRAVEL BY PREMIUM TRAINS ON LTC TO BE RESTRICTED TO ENTITLED CLASS

No. 31011/ 2/ 2015-Estt.(A-IV) Government of India Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions Department of Personnel and Training North Block, New Delhi-110 001 Dated: 27thJanuary, 2015 

OFFICE MEMORANDUM 
Subject: Travel by Premium Trains on LTC- Clarification reg. 

The undersigned is directed to say that several references are received by this Department from various Ministry/ Departments seeking clarification regarding admissibility of travel by Premium Trains run by Indian Railways while availing of LTC. 

2. The matter has been examined in consultation with Department of Expenditure, Ministry of Finance and it has been decided that travel by Premium Trains is not permissible on LTC. Hence, the fare charged by the Indian Railways for the journey(s) performed by Premium trains shall not be reimbursable for the purpose of LTC. Cases where LTC travel in such Premium Trains has already been undertaken by the Central Government Employees, the train fare may be reimbursed restricting it to the admissible normal fare for the entitled class of train travel or the actual fare paid, whichever is less. \ (B. Bandyopadhyay) Under Secretary to the Govt. of India To All Ministries/ Departments of the Government of India. 

Copy to: 1. Comptroller & Auditor General of India, New Delhi. 2. Union Public Service Commission, New Delhi. 3. Central Vigilance Commission, New Delhi. 4. Central Bureau of Investigations, New Delhi. 5. Parliament Library, New Delhi. 6. All Union Territory Administrations. 7. Lok Sabha/ Rajya Sabha Secretariat. 8. All Officers and Sections in the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions 9. All Attached and Subordinate Offices of Ministry of Personnel, P.G. & Pensions. 10. NIC, DoP&T with the request to upload this O.M. on Department's web site (OMs/Orders Establishment LTC Rules) 

REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY RETIREMENT FROM PERSONS SUFFERING WITH DISABILITY - REGARDING







REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY RETIREMENT FROM PERSONS SUFFERING WITH DISABILITY - REGARDING

CONDUCTING OF SUPPLEMENTRY


Procedure for conduct of supplementary DPC – Dopt issued orders with illustration



G.I., Dep. of Per. & Trg., O.M.No. 22011/2/2014- Estt.D, dated 30.1.2015

Subject:- Procedure for conduct of supplementary DPC

This Department instructions issued vide OM No. 22011/5/86-Estt (D) dated 10.4.89 [para 6.4.2 (i)] provide that vacancies occurring due to death, voluntary retirement, new creations etc. could not be foreseen at the time of placing facts and material before the DPC, therefore, another meeting of DPC (commonly referred to supplementary DPC) should be held for drawing up a panel for these vacancies.

2. References have been received with regard to the zone of consideration, the eligibility list for the supplementary DPC and whether officers who are included in the panel by the original DPC or in the extended panel but could not be promoted as these anticipated vacancies do not actually become available could be appointed against the additional vacancies later becoming available for the same vacancy year.

3. These issues have been examined in consultation with UPSC and following is decided:-

(i) The zone of consideration, in case of holding supplementary DPC, shall be fixed as per the provisions in this Department OM No. 22011/2/2002-Estt(D) dated 6.1.2006 keeping in view total number of vacancies arising in a particular vacancy year i.e. vacancies accounted in Original DPC + additional vacancies becoming available subsequently during the same year.

(ii) The eligibility list for supplementary DPC shall be prepared by removing the names of all such officers who have already been assessed by earlier DPC as fit, unfit or placed in the sealed cover by the original DPC before placing the same for consideration by the supplementary DPC.

(iii) The officers who have already been empanelled or placed in the extended panel but could not be promoted due to these vacancies not actually becoming available; need not be re-assessed by the supplementary DPC as the assessment matrix remains the same. They may be appointed against the additional vacancies of the same vacancy year as per recommendations of the earlier DPC. In such situation the number of vacancies for supplementary DPC shall be accordingly adjusted.

4. While calculating the regular vacancies for a DPC, it is incumbent upon administrative department to ensure that there is no arbitrariness in calculation of anticipated vacancies.

5. To provide clarity in implementation of these instructions some situation specific illustrations are enclosed as Annexure to this OM.

Illustration

Original DPC
No. of vacancies 5

Normal zone 5 x 2 + 4 = 14

Extended zone 5 x 5 = 25

Supplementary DPC

No. of vacancies – 2

Zone of consideration will be decided taking into account total number of vacancies in the vacancy year, i.e. 7 (Vacancies at the time of original DPC + unanticipated vacancies for the same year i.e. 5+2) in this case.

For 7 vacancies, normal zone is 7 x 2 + 4 = 18

Extended Zone 7 x 5 = 35

Situation 1 - In the original DPC, first 5 officers are assessed as ‘Fit’ and no officer is assessed for extended panel or assessed as ‘Unfit’ and/or kept in ‘Sealed Cover’

Zone of consideration for Supplementary DPC will now be 13 (Normal Zone of consideration for total number of vacancies for that year — number of officers assessed by earlier DPC i.e 18-5).

As such, in the eligibility list of Supplementary DPC in the above illustration, 13 officers (9 left over officers from the original DPC and 4 additional officers) shall be included.

Situation 2 – In the original DPC, first 5 officers are assessed as ‘Fit’ and next 3 officers are assessed for extended panel and no officer is assessed as ‘Unfit’ and for kept in ‘Sealed Cover’

Zone of consideration for Supplementary DPC will now be 10 (Normal Zone of consideration for total number of vacancies for that year — number of officers assessed by earlier DPC i.e 18-8).

As such, in the eligibility list of Supplementary DPC in the above illustration, 10 officers (6 left over officers from the original DPC and 4 additional officers) shall be included.

Situation 3 - In the original DPC, 5 officers are assessed as ‘Fit’, 2 officers are assessed for extended panel and 4 officers are assessed as Unfit’ and/or kept in ‘Sealed Cover’

Zone of consideration for Supplementary DPC will now be 7 (Normal Zone of consideration for total number of vacancies for that year — number of officers assessed by earlier DPC i.e 18-11)

As such, in the eligibility of Supplementary DPC in the above illustration, 7 officers (3 left over officer not assessed in the original DPC and 4 additional officers) shall be included in the normal zone.

Extended Zone in situation 1, 2 & 3 above:

Extended zone in the Supplementary DPC, wherever resorted to, may be operated accordingly leaving out the SC/ST officers assessed by the original DPC.

Important - In the Supplementary DPC, (a) Zone of consideration (Normal as well as Extended) shall be decided taking into account total number of vacancies in the relevant vacancy year; and (b) all the officers already assessed in the original DPC are not to be included in the fresh zone of consideration in respect of the S-DPC.

Authority: www.persmin.gov.in (DoPT)

Friday, 13 February 2015

ENCASHMENT OF LEAVE RESTRICTED TO ONE TIME IN THE SAME YEAR WHEN AVAILED SEPARATELY FOR EACH MEMBERS

Com. S.K. VYAS,  THE MOST RESPECTABLE, VALIANT,COMPASSIONATE, BELOVED  LEADER OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, PENSIONERS, ESPECIALLY THE AUDIT AND ACCOUNTS FRATERNITY PASSED AWAY TODAY 13-02-2015 AT JIPUR . WE DIP OUR FLAG IN RESPECT TO  OUR LEADER

LONG LIVE COM. S.K. VYAS, LONG LIVE WORKERS STRUGGLE, LONG LIVE WORKERS UNITY

A.B. SUNILKUMAR

SECRETARY GENERAL
ALL INDIA ASSOCIATION OF PAY & ACCOUNTS OFFICERS (CIVIL)